SECURITY
Source: Dr. Fernando Hernández Sánchez
with cooperation of Public Security Maestrandos
, the IUPFA (May 2009)
Instituto Universitario de la Policia Federal Argentina
Master Public Safety
Security Ethics Chair.
; Head: Dr. Fernando Hernández Sánchez
SECURITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS.
This paper arises from a sort of symposium to be held in two sessions and is an academic work. Given the breadth of the subject was intended to pin it down by definitions that could be called classics, and from there find the link between Security, Law and Ethics.
The security comes from the Latin word, securitas and colloquial language may have the sense of absence of risk or also the confidence in something or someone. In more technical sense, can be understood as a set of methods, procedures and techniques to address threats or risks. This system is based on the monopoly of power in the hands of the state and is influenced by political, economic, cultural and social. Safety Science would then theoretically the face, while systematic set of propositions based on rigorous analysis of the phenomena that make the protection of persons, goods and rights against risks and threats.
Human rights are those freedoms, rights or claims relating to commodities that concern all human beings on the mere fact of being and are independent of gender, ethnicity, religion or nationality and are not solely dependent of existing legislation. Usually defined as related to the individual, irrevocable, inalienable, nontransferable and inalienable. They are also timeless and independent of social or historical contexts. From the ethical point of view, the subject of this chair, human rights are a set of powers that belong to all human beings because of their dignity, dignity mean by the fact that everyone has a role to play in your life and must achieve their goals in harmony with others. This is where the state plays a role as moderator.
The State, in any case, it becomes part of the problem is interpreted as the term, each time responded to the question. Human rights are born with the first globalization of the modern age, namely the discovery of America for the first time raised the issue of "other" settled the matter to determine the School of Salamanca that the Indian "is a child of God and the subject of law "but does not speak of human rights, but" natural rights ", ie, typical of human nature. In a second Enlightenment theory promoted civil and political rights, which take shape as early as the nineteenth century. The economic, social and cultural rights arise from social and constitutionalism are own twentieth century.
More recently, human rights groups consider the person at the community and require the effort of society: individuals, state and various entities, both public and private. Are defined as collective rights as they affect groups of people who are in the same situation, that among these rights appear to users and consumers, the right to personal development, the right to peace, environment, security , etc. Collective rights are enforceable both the state and individuals.
security is therefore one of the human rights enshrined in various international treaties to which our country has acceded. But we see that it has been stated as such, along with others, only at the end of the twentieth century, more precisely when there is the ethical conflict, for example, the atrocities committed during the two world wars or the results of two socio-economic policies, the Marxist and capitalist Marxism depersonalized the individual, making it a state gear, depersonalized capitalism to make it a consumer body. Both, to depersonalize, take away the dignity, loss of dignity, the man responsible is no longer free, or free responsibly, pardon the pun. Front
to a global situation that we observed, personal insecurity and ethical is it fair to judge a person (call it criminal) standards that the system created to regulate society, when that person has not acquired the morality behind such standards for nutrition and lack of systematic education? Conversely why have somehow lost dignity, that person has more rights as the victim? There would be more questions to ask and this paper is not intended to give the answers because:
obviously has broken the social fabric.
The law has been overtaken by circumstances.
education system prepares student to "do", not to be.
The health system is managed with economic (and not referring exclusively to our country)
The administration of justice suffers the same problems (and we mean not only our country, etc.).
The first point, we believe, is the most interesting from the ethical: the restoration of the social fabric is a must. Others are problems of the modern nation-state crisis emerged in the fifteenth century. But this same new questions arise: Can I restore the social fabric without the intervention of the state? Can a crisis state that promote restoration?
someone said that a book is good, not giving answers but the questions it suggests. Perhaps this paper will serve as a starting point for further exchanges on the second leg of the course Ethics and Human Rights, contributing to the Public Safety and concrete theories applicable to the problems it poses.
LOWERING http://fms-seguridades.blogspot.com/2009/05/deontologia-de-la-seguridad.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment